Three results
29th_June_2010: Three results
Charlie suffered a bit in the last round and wondered if he could fight harder when he was losing. IM Douglas Bryson once said that in every game he wins there is one point where he loses control and the likely result of the game wobbles for a moment. That should tell us that in our games there may be opportunities to strike back: we can still hope for a draw or even a win when we are losing. This is part of a more general problem of getting the right result for you in a game. Jonathan Rowson talks about playing for two results as opposed to three, or even one... If you aim at a win and miss, you might draw, but if you aim for a draw and miss?We often talk about winning a won game, or indeed losing one. I thought about making some notes on
| Winning... |
...won |
||
| Drawing... |
a |
...drawn |
...game. |
| Losing... |
...lost |
Let's consider:
| Winning |
Drawing |
Losing |
|
| Won |
|||
| Better |
|||
| Drawn |
|||
| Worse |
|||
| Lost |
And putting a bit of meat on the bones, some advice, some good examples, some horrible examples, some master games, some club games:
| Winning |
Drawing |
Losing |
|
| Won |
EG:
Botvinnik-Szilyagi EG: Regis-Dale EG: Regis-Anderson
|
EG:
Regis-Knox
|
EG:
Regis-Walton EG: Regis-Paulden EG: Royle-Marsh
|
| Better |
EG:
Botvinnik-Kann EG: Ditmas-Regis EG: Brusey-Regis
|
EG:
Regis-Greet EG: Blackmore-Isaac EG: Morgan
|
EG:
Regis-Lubrook EG: Brusey-Regis
|
| Drawn |
EG:
Miles-Webb EG: Regis-Hewson EG: Gurevich-Short
|
EG:
Richmond-Regis
|
EG:
Regis-Jamieson EG: Capablanca-Menchik
|
| Worse |
EG:
Gosling-Regis EG: Pope-Regis
|
EG:
Regis-Sedgwick EG: Waley-Keen
|
EG:
Waley-Keen EG: Regis-Anderson
|
| Lost |
EG:
Annetts-Regis EG: Stean-Webb The Swindle:
|
EG:
Regis-Greet EG: Waters-Regis
|
EG:
Brusey-Regis
|
Several of these squares complement each other (highlighted): if you are trying to win a better game, your opponent should be at least trying to avoid losing!
Let's start with Charlie's initial bleat: how to avoid losing. EG:
Waley-Keen.Well, there was certainly the moment when White lost control, right
at the end, and perhaps the way to find the best line for Black was the
process of elimination (41...Kb5?? loses to two fairly obvious checks,
so that's a hint to play 41...Kb7).
Working backwards, and with the help of Fritz, we can find some
improvements for Black.

However, I can't find a move that gives
Black any counterplay. In fact, Black's attempts at getting some
play (22...f5? and 36...b5) just make things worse!
So this was one of those unpleasant games where Black just has to avoid making the situation worse, and find small ways to make things better (22...f6 and 23...Kf7 doesn't save the game for Black, but improves the position a little). Karpov was the master at this sort of thing, whether he was better or worse!
However, that is a pretty miserable way to play chess, so I'm going
to point the finger at 8...exd4?!, making a concession for no good
reason, and also 3...Be7, which rather says that Black is making things
up as they go along -- which I had a lot to say about last time.